Behavior Therapy Associates>What works
What works? A summary of alcohol treatment research |
|
![]() |
The following is a copy of a table from Chapter 2, "What works? A summary of alcohol treatment research" in R. K. Hester & W.R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches: Effective alternatives (3rd ed.), 2003, Allyn & Bacon. To order this book, click here. |
| Click on each link below for more information about each treatment. For information on what each column means, scroll to the bottom of the page. | |
|
Treatment
Modality
|
Rank order
|
Cumulative
Evidence Score
|
Number of
studies
|
%+
|
Mean Methodological
Quotient Score
|
Mean Severity
of Treatment Population
|
% Excellent
|
| Brief interventions |
1
|
390
|
34
|
74
|
13.29
|
2.47
|
53
|
| Motivational enhancement |
2
|
189
|
18
|
72
|
12.83
|
2.72
|
50
|
| GABA agonist (Acamprosate) |
3
|
116
|
5
|
100
|
11.60
|
3.80
|
20
|
| Community Reinforcement |
4.5
|
110
|
7
|
86
|
14.00
|
3.43
|
71
|
| Self-change manual (Bibliotherapy) |
4.5
|
110
|
17
|
59
|
12.65
|
2.59
|
53
|
| Opiate antagonist (Naltrexone) |
6
|
100
|
6
|
83
|
11.33
|
3.17
|
0
|
| Behavioral self-control training |
7
|
85
|
31
|
52
|
12.77
|
2.91
|
52
|
| Behavior contracting |
8
|
64
|
5
|
80
|
10.40
|
3.60
|
0
|
| Social skills training |
9
|
57
|
20
|
55
|
10.9
|
3.80
|
25
|
| Marital therapy-Behavioral |
10
|
44
|
9
|
56
|
12.33
|
3.44
|
44
|
| Aversion therapy-Nausea |
11
|
36
|
6
|
50
|
10.50
|
3.83
|
17
|
|
Case managment
|
12
|
33
|
5
|
80
|
10.50
|
3.75
|
0
|
| Cognitive Therapy |
13
|
21
|
10
|
40
|
10.00
|
3.70
|
10
|
| Aversion Therapy, Covert Sensitization |
14.5
|
18
|
8
|
38
|
10.88
|
3.50
|
0
|
| Aversion therapy, Apneic |
14.5
|
18
|
3
|
67
|
9.67
|
3.33
|
0
|
| Family therapy |
16
|
15
|
4
|
50
|
9.25
|
3.25
|
0
|
| Acupuncture |
17
|
14
|
3
|
67
|
9.67
|
3.67
|
0
|
| Client-centered Counsling |
18
|
5
|
8
|
50
|
11.13
|
3.38
|
13
|
| Aversion therapy, Electrical |
19
|
-1
|
18
|
44
|
11.06
|
3.78
|
17
|
| Exercise |
20
|
-3
|
3
|
33
|
11.00
|
2.00
|
0
|
| Stress Management |
21
|
-4
|
3
|
33
|
10.33
|
2.67
|
0
|
| Antidipsotropic- Disulfiram |
22
|
-6
|
27
|
44
|
11.07
|
3.69
|
26
|
| Antidepressant-SSRI |
23
|
-16
|
15
|
53
|
8.60
|
2.67
|
0
|
| Problem Solving |
24
|
-26
|
4
|
25
|
12.25
|
3.75
|
50
|
| Lithium |
25
|
-32
|
7
|
43
|
11.43
|
3.71
|
29
|
| Marital therapy- Nonbehavioral |
26
|
-33
|
8
|
38
|
12.25
|
3.63
|
25
|
| Group process psychotherapy |
27
|
-34
|
3
|
0
|
8.00
|
2.67
|
0
|
| Functional analysis |
28
|
-36
|
3
|
0
|
12.00
|
2.67
|
33
|
| Relapse prevention |
29
|
-38
|
22
|
36
|
11.73
|
3.23
|
31
|
| Self-monitoring |
30
|
-39
|
6
|
33
|
12.00
|
3.17
|
50
|
| Hypnosis |
31
|
-41
|
4
|
0
|
10.25
|
3.75
|
0
|
| Psychedelic medication |
32
|
-44
|
8
|
25
|
10.13
|
3.63
|
0
|
| Antidipsotropic-calcium carbimide |
33
|
-52
|
3
|
0
|
10.00
|
4.00
|
0
|
| Attention Placebo |
34
|
-59
|
3
|
0
|
12.33
|
3.33
|
33
|
| Serotonin agonist |
35
|
-68
|
3
|
0
|
11.33
|
2.33
|
0
|
| Treatment as usual |
36
|
-78
|
15
|
27
|
9.07
|
3.07
|
13
|
| Twelve-step facilitation |
37
|
-82
|
6
|
17
|
15.00
|
3.67
|
83
|
| Alcoholics anonymous |
38
|
-94
|
7
|
14
|
10.71
|
3.14
|
29
|
| Anxiolytic medication |
39
|
-98
|
15
|
27
|
8.13
|
3.40
|
0
|
| Milieu therapy |
40
|
-102
|
14
|
21
|
10.86
|
3.64
|
29
|
| Antidipsotropic-metronidazole |
41
|
-103
|
11
|
9
|
9.73
|
3.73
|
0
|
| Antidepressant medication (non-SSRI) |
42
|
-104
|
6
|
0
|
8.67
|
3.17
|
0
|
| Videotape sefl-confrontation |
43
|
-108
|
8
|
0
|
10.50
|
3.34
|
13
|
| Relaxation training |
44
|
-152
|
18
|
17
|
10/56
|
3.06
|
17
|
| Confrontational Counseling |
45
|
-183
|
12
|
0
|
10.25
|
3.00
|
33
|
| Psychotherapy |
46
|
-207
|
19
|
16
|
10.89
|
3.26
|
21
|
| Gerneral alcoholism counseling |
47
|
-284
|
23
|
9
|
11.26
|
3.22
|
22
|
| Education (tapes, lectures, or films) |
48
|
-443
|
39
|
13
|
9.77
|
2.44
|
1.5
|
| Cumulative Evidence Score (CES). The CES is figured in this way. For each study, the Methodological Quality Score is multiplied by the Outcome Logic Score (not shown). Then they added up all these scores for a particular modality. So the CES is a function of the number of studies, the scientific rigor of each study, and the outcomes for a treatment within each study. |
| Mean Methodological Quotient Score. This is the average score of the scientific rigor of each study in a particular modality. Scores can range from 0 to 17. |
| Mean Severity of Treatment Population. This reflects the average of how severely dependent the population studied was. Scores range from 1 (less severe alcohol related problems and dependence) to 4 (severe alcohol dependence). |
|
% Excellent This is the percent of studies in each treatment category that had high Methodological Quotient Scores (>13 on scale of 1-17). |
|
Back to Home Page for Behavior Therapy Associates. Copyright 2003. Reprinted with permission from Allyn & Bacon. Last revised April 30, 2003. |